AnTuTu Benchmark Comparison. On AnTuTu, the Snapdragon 835 has recorded a total score of 181,833. This score is very far from the Samsung Exynos 9820 which records a total of 325,067 points in AnTuTu. On the other hand, the Exynos 7904, obtained a much lower score than both chipsets with only 108,290 points. The Exynos 9 series are said to be built on the same 10nm FinFET technology and will directly compete against Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835 SoC, Huawei's Kirin 970 chip and Apple's A10 Fusion The fps stability was also 42% higher on the Snapdragon 855 model than the Exynos 9820 device. The CPU usage was 2.10% higher on the Exynos S10 compared to the Snapdragon S10+. In regards to Samsung Exynos Exynos 9810 Benchmarks Performance Rating- Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU- SD 855 43.3 pt(75%) Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T-76% Qualcomm Snapdragon So găng 4 chipset đầu bảng: Snapdragon 845, Exynos 9810, Kirin 970 và Apple A11 Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 13/12/17 38 bình luận Tại hội nghị công nghệ ở Hawaii, Qualcomm cho ra mắt chipset thế hệ mới nhất Snapdragon 845. Họ tuyên bố rằng, Snapdragon 845 có hiệu suất lên đến hơn 30% so với Snapdragon 835 và còn hỗ trợ mạnh mẽ cho công nghệ VR. Holy sh the Snapdragon is quite better than the Exynos in almost every test, except geekbench The Exynos have a super weird behaviour where it has theoretical peak performance over the Snapdragon but in no real world test is faster (In fact is slower. Noticeably slower sometimes) This is consistent with Anandtech's findings on their hands-on. 5Rff. VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 850 with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 850 Announced 3-years and 7-months laterHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nmHigher GPU frequency ~11%Better instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score – 316K vs 146K23% higher CPU clock speed 2450 vs 2000 MHz Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 43099 82968 GPU 24795 105394 Memory 35711 49513 UX 41901 75726 Total score 146475 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 98% 95% Graphics test 3 FPS 6 FPS Score 508 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2000 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache - 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count - 3 billion TDP 3 W 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 2 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 820 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 6 2 Shading units 96 384 FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth - Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU No Hexagon 682 Storage type eMMC UFS Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem - X16 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 16 5G support No No Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 31 Total votes 36 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 850, or ask any questions Home Mobile Exynos and Snapdragon have been neck and neck for years, but according to Geekbench, there's definitely a winner. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption, but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of 250 benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. Device Chipset Model Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 801 SM-G900F Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos 5422 SM-G900H Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 805 SM-G901F Samsung Galaxy S6 Exynos 7420 SM-G920F Samsung Galaxy S7 Exynos 8890 SM-G930L Samsung Galaxy S7 Snapdragon 820 SM-G930A Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895 SM-G950N Samsung Galaxy S8 Snapdragon 835 SM-G950U Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos 9810 SM-G960F Samsung Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 SM-G960U1 Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 SM-G973F Samsung Galaxy S10 Snapdragon 855 SM-G973U Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990 SM-G986B Samsung Galaxy S20 Snapdragon 865 SM-G980F Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 SM-G991N Samsung Galaxy S21 Snapdragon 888 SM-G9910 Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200 SM-S901B Samsung Galaxy S22 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM-S901E About Geekbench Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images, rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics. The final score is weighted according to the designer’s considerations, placing a large emphasis on integer performance 65%, then float performance 30%, and finally, cryptography 5%. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Samsung Galaxy Exynos devices The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. The Exynos 5422 is nowhere near what we would nowadays call a powerhouse, with a measly score of 176 in single-core and an equally weedy score of 322 in multi-core. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S22 with its Exynos 2200 SoC boasts just shy of a 10x improvement in multi-core speeds and a improvement in single-core speeds over the original Exynos 5422 that powered the Galaxy S5. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. The jump from the Exynos 8895 to the 9810 was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. This particular score jump is likely due to the switch from Exynos M2 cores to Exynos M3 cores and an upgrade from Cortex A53 cores to Cortex A55. With an increase in cache size from 2MB to 4MB as well, we would see a decrease in cache miss rates and, in turn, a further improvement in performance as the CPU should be able to fetch more instructions from the cache instead of from the slower main memory. Further generations found a more even footing, with smaller but consistent increases of roughly 20% each time in single and multi-core performance. Samsung Galaxy Snapdragon devices Snapdragon chipsets are the cream of the crop in the Android world, and just like with the above Exynos results, these results show how far Qualcomm has come over the years. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of 156 and 445, respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon 888. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. Instead, it's a relatively smooth and consistent improvement year over year. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon 810 faced. It was the first 64-bit chip from Qualcommm and would overheat quite severely. It was even blamed for why the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P faced major bootlooping problems. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. However, one thing is for sure Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos 2100. Samsung Galaxy Exynos and Snapdragon devices For the wider context of how Snapdragon and Exynos compare across generations, it's clear that they've always been close in performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. In short, these results show the neck-and-neck nature of the chipset performance race and how both Qualcomm and Samsung keep up with each other. Samsung appears to lag behind a little bit, but for the most part, both do quite well and Samsung is never too far behind Qualcomm in terms of its actual performance. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. We're looking forward to the Samsung Galaxy S23 series, and with rumors suggesting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, it's possible that there may not even be an Exynos variant this year. We'll see! VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 980 with Mali-G76 MP5 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 980 Announced 2-years and 10-months laterHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nmShows better up to 23% AnTuTu 9 score – 389K vs 316KSupports 14% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 11% higher CPU clock speed 2450 vs 2200 MHz Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 124952 82968 GPU 98562 105394 Memory 67798 49513 UX 95757 75726 Total score 389936 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression - Mpixels/s Face detection - images/s Speech recognition - words/s Machine learning - images/s Camera shooting - images/s HTML 5 - Mnodes/s SQLite - Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability - 95% Graphics test - 6 FPS Score - 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 980 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Cortex-A776x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2200 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache - 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count - 3 billion TDP 9 W 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP5 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 728 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 5 2 Shading units 80 384 FLOPS 576 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type eMMC UFS UFS Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5123 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 3550 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1380 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 980, or ask any questions 56 características comparadasQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9820Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 é melhor que Samsung Exynos 9820?Clock do GPU 110MHz mais rápido?710MHzvs600MHzPossui NX bit? mais largura de banda de memória? que Samsung Exynos 9820 é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835?Velocidade RAM 267MHz maior?2133MHzvs1866MHzSemicondutor 2nm menor?8nmvs10nmDownloads mais rápidos?2000MBits/svs1024MBits/sUtiliza HMP?4GB a mais de tamanho máximo de memória?12GBvs8GBCarregamento mais rápido?316MBits/svs150MBits/s2 canais de memória a mais?4vs2Avaliações de usuáriosClassificação geralQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos 98202 Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos Avaliações de usuáriosRecursoInformações geraisUm sistema operacional 32-bit pode suportar, no máximo, 4GB de RAM. Sistemas 64-bit permite mais do que 4GB, proporcionando maior desempenho. Também é possível executar aplicativos uma placa de vídeo integrada, você não precisa comprar uma placa pequenos proporcionam melhor desempenho e menor consumo de energia. Chipsets com um maior número de transistores, componentes semicondutores de dispositivos eletrônicos, oferecem mais poder computacional. Um fator de forma pequeno permite que mais transistores se encaixem em um chip, aumentando, assim, seu unidade de processamento gráfico GPU tem uma velocidade de clock mais DirectX é usado em games, com as versões mais novas suportando gráficos tecnologia sem fio 5G. A rede móvel de quinta geração oferece velocidades mais altas e latência menor do que a rede de quarta geração GPU Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Quando a GPU está rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode aumentar a velocidade para um clock superior a fim de fornecer desempenho OpenGL ES é usado para games em dispositivos móveis, tais como smartphones. As versões mais recentes suportam gráficos aplicativos usam OpenCL para desfrutar do poder da unidade de processamento de gráficos GPU para computação não gráfica. As versões mais recentes introduzem mais funcionalidade e melhor velocidade da CPU ou processador indica quantos ciclos de processamento podem ser executados por uma CPU a cada segundo, considerando todos os seus núcleos unidades de processamento. Essa velocidade é calculada pela soma da capacidade de cada núcleo – ou, no caso de processadores multinúcleos que empregam diferentes microarquiteturas, de cada grupo de threads resulta em desempenho mais rápido e melhor a tecnologia um chip pode alternar entre dois conjuntos de núcleos de processador, a fim de maximizar o desempenho do aparelho e a duração da bateria. Durante uma partida de jogo, por exemplo, os núcleos mais potentes são utilizados para otimizar a performance, enquanto o ato de checar e-mails aciona núcleos menos potentes para prolongar a duração da Multiprocessamento Heterogêneo HMP - "Heterogenous Multi-Processing" é uma versão mais avançada da tecnologia Nesta configuração, o processador pode utilizar todos os núcleos ao mesmo tempo, ou apenas um núcleo para tarefas de baixa intensidade. Isso pode, respectivamente, fornecer desempenho mais potente ou prolongar a duração da turbo do clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Quando a CPU estiver rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode acelerar a velocidade de clock para oferecer desempenho L2 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L2 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um L1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L1 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um de clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820O multiplicador de clock controla a velocidade da L3 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L3 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um suportar memória mais rápida, fornecendo melhor desempenho ao memória DDR Double Data Rate é o tipo mais comum de memória RAM. As versões mais recentes de memória DDR suportam velocidades máximas mais altas e consomem menos quantidade máxima de memória RAM.Esta é a taxa máxima de dados que podem ser lidos ou armazenados na canais de memória aumenta a velocidade de transferência de dados entre a memória e a eMMC Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um versão mais elevada de eMMC permite interfaces de memória mais rápidos, o que tem um efeito positivo no desempenho do dispositivo. Por exemplo, quando transfere arquivos de seu computador para um armazenamento interno usando código corretor de erros de memória pode detectar e corrigir dados corrompidos. Ele é usado quando é essencial evitar corrupção, tal como em computação científica ou ao se executar um sistema em um chip SoC tem um chip celular LTE integrado. O LTE é capaz de fazer downloads a velocidades mais rápidas do que a antiga tecnologia velocidade de download é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode acessar conteúdo velocidade de upload é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode enviar informações para um servidor ou outro tecnologia integrada no processador para proteger o dispositivo para uso com ferramentas como pagamentos móveis e streaming de vídeo usando gerenciamento de direitos digitais DRM.A tecnologia multithreading como Hyperthreading da Intel ou Multithreading Simultâneo da AMD fornece um maior desempenho dividindo cada um dos núcleos físicos do processador em núcleos virtuais, também conhecidos como threads. Dessa forma, cada núcleo pode executar dois fluxos de instruções ao mesmo bit ajuda a proteger o computador de ataques fornece aceleração para processamento de mídia, tal como escutar AES é usado para acelerar a criptografia e a VFP Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Vector Floating-Point VFP é usado pelo processador para entregar desempenho aumentado em áreas tais como imagem 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de núcleo único de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de múltiplos núcleos de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023resultado PassMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando múltiplas PassMark único Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando uma única PassMark em overclock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU enquanto ela está com Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Exibir tudo VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9820 with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 9820 Announced 2-years laterShows significantly better up to 62% AnTuTu 9 score – 513K vs 316KHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nm11% higher CPU clock speed 2730 vs 2450 MHzSupports 12% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Higher GPU frequency ~5% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 133777 82968 GPU 178210 105394 Memory 88990 49513 UX 109918 75726 Total score 513831 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 82% 95% Graphics test 19 FPS 6 FPS Score 3228 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Mongoose M42x GHz – Cortex-A754x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2730 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion 3 billion TDP - 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 702 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 12 2 Shading units 192 384 FLOPS 607 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 12 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type UFS UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5100 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 18 Total votes 41 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9810 with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 10 nmShows better up to 27% AnTuTu 9 score – 522K vs 410KAnnounced 11-months laterSupports 19% higher memory bandwidth against GB/s Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 116977 141555 GPU 121725 184296 Memory 74973 62560 UX 93023 131223 Total score 410178 522806 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s 21 images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s 48 images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 93% 91% Graphics test 13 FPS 18 FPS Score 2272 3096 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS [Ultra] Call of Duty Mobile - 56 FPS [Ultra] Fortnite - 28 FPS [Ultra] Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS [Ultra] World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang - 57 FPS [Ultra] Device - Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 855 CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Exynos M34x GHz – Cortex-A55 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver Cores 8 8 Frequency 2900 MHz 2840 MHz Instruction set L1 cache - 512 KB L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB L3 cache - 2 MB Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 5 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Adreno 640 Architecture Bifrost 2 Adreno 600 GPU frequency 572 MHz 585 MHz Execution units 18 2 Shading units 288 384 FLOPS 370 Gigaflops 899 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1800 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 6 GB 16 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 690 Storage type UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS Video playback 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS Video codecs VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Shannon 360 X24 LTE, X50 5G 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 20 5G support No Yes Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 5000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 1240 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 6 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 316 Total votes 438 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810